Embracing Marketing Mistakes
Welcome to the world's number one podcast on Marketing Mistakes by Prohibition PR. This podcast is specifically for senior marketers determined to grow their brands by learning from real-world screw ups.
Each week, join hosts Chris Norton and Will Ockenden, seasoned PR professionals with over 45 years of combined experience, as they candidly explore the marketing failures most marketers would rather forget. Featuring insightful conversations with industry-leading marketing experts and value-packed solo episodes, the show tries to uncover the valuable lessons from genuine marketing disasters and, crucially, the tips and steps you need to take to avoid them.
Chris and Will bring practical experience from founding the award-winning PR agency Prohibition PR, where they have successfully guided top brands to significant growth through PR strategy, social media, media relations, content marketing, and strategic brand-building.
Tune in to turn f*ck ups into progress, mistakes into lessons, and challenges into real-life competitive advantages. Well, we hope so anyway.
Embracing Marketing Mistakes
Inside the Haircare CGI Mishap That Stopped a Campaign
As Creative Marketer Anil Manji joined the show, he reflected on an early-career incident that continues to guide his thinking today. We take you into this segment of episode 40, inside a haircare TV ad that reused legacy footage, layered on a week of pricey CGI to turn shampoo into conditioner, and accidentally created a texture that read like something no brand wants on primetime. The client’s blunt feedback changed everything, and once we heard it, we couldn’t unsee it either.
We break down how efficient asset reuse can backfire when context and semiotics are ignored, why fluid simulations demand more than photorealism, and how a single freeze-frame can become meme fuel. From the first treatment to the final cut, we map the decisions that led us there: close-up hair shots, a convincing squeeze-to-palm animation, and the overlooked risk in colour, opacity, and flow. Then we show the fix that is warmer tones, micro-bubbles, altered angles, and strand separation which pulled the work back into brand-safe territory without losing impact.
This conversation goes beyond one mishap. We talk perception checks, diverse feedback loops, and how to design review gates that ask, “What could this be mistaken for?” We dig into sunk-cost bias during CGI iterations, how to use cold reads at key milestones, and why creative teams should plan for what social media might clip and share. If you work in advertising, brand management, or production, you’ll get practical steps to reduce risk while keeping speed: better briefs for reused footage, early semiotic audits, and a culture where someone can say the awkward truth sooner.
If this story helped sharpen your creative process, follow the show, share it with your team, and leave a quick review telling us your most unforgettable client note.
Click on this link to the full episode 40:
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2206375/episodes/15606126
Is your strategy still right for 2026? Book a free 15-min discovery call to get tailored insights to boost your brand’s growth. 👉 [Book your call with Chris now] 👈
Subscribe to our Newsletter
✒️Don't miss a hilarious mistake or free event by 👉 subscribing to our newsletter here. 👈
Follow Chris Norton:
X, TikTok, LinkedIn
Follow Will Ockenden:
LinkedIn
Follow The Show:
TikTok, YouTube
Um well the the theme of the show is um embracing marketing mistakes. So we we are what we often ask ask our guest um what mistakes have they made during their career and what they learnt from. With you having such a um a big career already and and you you're just 30, I'm imagining at the moment. Is that right? You're 30? What's the you you've put down a mistake here about a TV ad, which has made us laugh a little bit. So do you want to walk us through what happened in your CGI TV campaign?
SPEAKER_00:I'm very interested. Yeah, this one's a little bit gross, so apologies. But um, yeah, this was when I first started out my career. I was working in the world of hair care. Um, and we were launching a new conditioner campaign. Often what happens, this is one of the fantastic things about work in advertising, you learn all the random trade secrets. You'll often take a shot from another TV ad or an older TV ad, so you don't need to re-shoot everything. So if I've got a new advert with a brunette, I might talk to my American team and say, okay, do you guys have anything that we could use? And you just chuck it in. We did this with a new conditioner campaign. We had a model with blonde hair, and so we took an old advert, uh a shampoo advert with a model with uh with blonde hair. Same brand though.
SPEAKER_01:Was it same brand?
SPEAKER_00:Same brand, yeah. Yeah. It happens all the time, all the time. Um and you wouldn't notice because you know sometimes the shot's like three seconds. So we used an older advert that featured Eddie Golding. It was a close-up of her hair, you couldn't see her face at all. Um, it might not have even been her in that particular shot, but you never know. We took that particular shot and we needed to turn it into conditioner. So we spent a huge amount of money on CGI, uh, looking at the application of the conditioner in the hair, thinking about the colour, the texture, the way it squirts out of the bottle, put onto the palm. Um, and we saw that iterative process. So, you know, every few hours we'd see it in CGI, and then a few days later we have the final product.
SPEAKER_01:So, how long did it take to do that? Up that process?
SPEAKER_00:Just under a week. It's uh it's really, it's a long time, really long time. Um and we finally packaged it up, put it into the main TV ad and send it off to the client for their review. We heard nothing back. Chased a few times, and then a few days later, I get a call. And I was quite junior at the time, so it's unusual for for me to get called about these things, but it becomes very obvious why a bit later. Um the client said, I hate it, I'm not putting this on TV. You need to you need to redo the CGI. I can't we can't just do that. It costs thousands. You know, what what's the feedback? We'll try to fix it. And he just wouldn't tell me for a while. I finally got out of him. And he says, It looks like cum. And I was like, What? Sorry. It looks like cum. It looks like semen. Uh I'm not putting this on TV.
SPEAKER_01:And it was interesting conditioner. Two bottles into the shower. Um blind. I mean, I can kind of see how. I mean, I want to see the video now. God gonna lie.
SPEAKER_00:Honestly, it was such an awful moment, and this particular client was male, and all of my managers were women, and I just don't think he really wanted to have that conversation with anything else. So you had to. Yeah, so then I had to go into a room with all of these senior people, the producers, um, you know, the agency that was doing the CGI, and deliver this feedback. And the worst thing is, you look at it, and when someone says that, it clicks. And you're you look at it and you can't he's completely right. He's completely right. And it looks awful, and you could just tell, you know, you there's such a worry there when you're like, Oh gosh, if this goes out on TV, with the right editing, it could become a terrible but hilarious meme. Um Yeah, it was a horrible, horrible week.
